The Department has issued regulations addressing how to analyze whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor under the FLSA (29 CFR part 795, effective March 11, 2024). Employees receive the protections of the FLSA. Independent contractors are in business for themselves and therefore are not covered by the FLSA.

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) and other federal agencies, as well as many state governments, use specific criteria to distinguish between employees and independent contractors. These criteria help ensure that workers receive appropriate protections and benefits based on their classification. While there isn’t a single set of rules universally applied, the guidelines generally revolve around the degree of control an employer exercises over a worker. Here are some common factors considered:

Behavioral Control: This refers to the degree to which the employer controls how the work is performed. Factors include instructions given to the worker, training provided, and evaluation methods used. Employees typically receive detailed instructions on when, where, and how to work, while independent contractors have more autonomy in completing tasks.

Financial Control: This aspect examines the extent to which the worker has financial independence and investment in the tools and equipment necessary to perform the job. Independent contractors often invest in their own tools and bear the costs of running their business, while employees typically rely on the employer’s resources.

Type of Relationship: This factor looks at the nature of the relationship between the worker and the employer. Key considerations include written contracts, benefits provided, and the permanency of the relationship. Employees often have long-term relationships with their employers and receive benefits such as health insurance and paid leave, whereas independent contractors typically work on a project basis and are responsible for their own benefits.

Integration: This refers to how integral the worker’s services are to the employer’s business. If the worker’s services are essential to the regular operations of the business, they are more likely to be classified as an employee. Independent contractors usually provide services that are separate from the core activities of the employer.

It’s important to note that no single factor is determinative, and the classification depends on the overall relationship between the worker and the employer. Additionally, the criteria may vary depending on the specific laws and regulations of each jurisdiction. Misclassification of workers can lead to legal liabilities for employers, including penalties for unpaid taxes and benefits. Therefore, it’s essential for employers to carefully evaluate the nature of their relationships with workers to ensure compliance with relevant laws and regulations.

Employment-at-will is a legal doctrine in the United States that allows employers to terminate employees for any reason, at any time, as long as the reason is not prohibited by law. This means that employers have broad discretion to hire and fire employees, and employees likewise have the freedom to resign from their positions without facing legal consequences. However, this doctrine is not absolute, and there are limits to it, particularly when it comes to wrongful termination allegations.

Wrongful termination allegations typically arise when an employee believes they were fired in violation of laws or agreements that protect them from unjust dismissal. Here are some common scenarios where wrongful termination allegations may occur within the context of employment-at-will:

• Discrimination: Employers cannot terminate employees based on protected characteristics such as race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, or genetic information. Wrongful termination claims may arise if an employee believes they were fired because of one of these protected characteristics, in violation of federal or state anti-discrimination laws.
• Retaliation: Employees are protected from retaliation for engaging in certain legally protected activities, such as reporting discrimination or harassment, whistleblowing, or exercising their rights under labor laws. If an employee is terminated in retaliation for engaging in these activities, they may have grounds for a wrongful termination claim under various federal and state laws.
• Violation of Public Policy: Wrongful termination claims can also arise when an employee is fired for reasons that violate public policy. For example, if an employee is terminated for refusing to engage in illegal activities, reporting illegal conduct, or exercising legal rights such as taking family or medical leave, the termination may be considered unlawful under the public policy exception to employment-at-will.
• Implied Contracts: While employment-at-will is the default rule in most states, courts may recognize implied contracts that modify the at-will relationship. Implied contracts can arise from employer policies, employee handbooks, oral assurances of job security, or past practices. If an employer breaches an implied contract by firing an employee in violation of its terms, the employee may have a wrongful termination claim.
• Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing: Some states recognize an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in employment relationships. This implies that employers must act in good faith when terminating employees, and they cannot terminate employees arbitrarily or in bad faith. Wrongful termination claims based on the breach of this covenant focus on the fairness and good faith of the employer’s actions. 
• Statutory Protections and Whistleblower Laws: Employees who report violations of law or public policy by their employers may be protected by whistleblower laws. Wrongful termination claims may arise if an employee is fired for whistleblowing, as such terminations are often prohibited by law.

While employment-at-will provides employers with broad discretion to terminate employees, wrongful termination allegations can arise when terminations violate laws, public policy, implied contracts, or the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Employers must be aware of these limits and ensure that terminations comply with applicable legal standards to avoid potential legal consequences.

Why Associations Use Lobbyists: Advocacy in Action 

In the modern world of business and industry, trade associations play a vital role in representing their members’ interests. For sectors like the life safety and property protection industry, which includes companies specializing in security systems, fire alarms, and monitoring services, navigating the complex landscape of public policy and regulation is crucial. This is where the role of a lobbyist becomes invaluable. But why do alarm associations opt to use lobbyists?

At its core, a lobbyist acts as a representative and advocate for the interests of the alarm association and its members. Lobbyists are trained professionals skilled in communicating with policymakers, legislators, and regulators. They ensure that the concerns, needs, and viewpoints of the life safety and property protection industry are effectively presented and considered in the policymaking process. 

One of the primary objectives of hiring a lobbyist is to influence the development, modification, or defeat of policies, laws, and regulations that impact the life safety and property protection industry. Lobbyists leverage their expertise, industry knowledge, and relationships with decision-makers to shape favorable policies and regulations. 

Lobbyists often have established relationships with key legislators, government officials, and regulatory authorities. This access allows them to communicate directly with decision-makers, providing a platform for the alarm association’s concerns and priorities. Such direct communication can significantly enhance the association’s ability to influence and shape public policy. 

Keeping abreast of legislative and regulatory developments is crucial for any industry association. Lobbyists play a pivotal role in monitoring proposed legislation, regulatory changes, and policy initiatives that could impact the life safety and property protection industry. They gather relevant information, analyze its implications, and provide timely updates to the association, enabling them to stay informed and proactive. 

Collaboration can amplify advocacy efforts. Lobbyists can help alarm associations build coalitions with other industry stakeholders, interest groups, and organizations. By forming strategic partnerships, the association can strengthen its advocacy efforts, broaden its influence, and create a united front on key issues affecting the life safety and property protection industry. 

The use of lobbyists by associations is a strategic approach to advocacy that offers numerous benefits. From effective representation and influence on policy to access to decision-makers and information gathering, lobbyists play a crucial role in advancing the interests of the life safety and property protection industry. By harnessing the expertise, networks, and advocacy skills of lobbyists, alarm associations can navigate the complexities of the political landscape, shape favorable policies, and ensure the continued growth and success of their members. 

In March 2019, the Louisiana State Fire Marshal issued Memorandum 2019-01, a directive aimed at enhancing fire safety measures across the state. This memorandum outlines crucial guidelines and regulations for various establishments, ensuring compliance and safeguarding against fire hazards. Understanding its provisions is essential for businesses, organizations, and individuals to prioritize fire safety and prevent potential disasters.

Key Provisions of Memorandum 2019-01:

1. Special locking Systems: The memorandum identifies the types of specialized locking systems as defined by the NFPA 101 Life Safety Code.  It also clarifies their use in required settings.

2. Electric Strikes and Latch Retracting Door Hardware: Interior Doors are required to be submitted to the SFMO for review prior to installation.  We bring this to your attention because this Memorandum does replace IM 2009-03 which stated otherwise.

3. Instructions for Plan Submittal for Special Locking Arrangements: The memorandum lists the information required for these types of submittals. Adhering to the list can make the process easier and faster for all parties involved.

Memorandum 2019-01 aligns with broader efforts to enhance fire safety standards and regulations at the state and national levels. By setting clear guidelines and expectations, it empowers stakeholders to take proactive measures to prevent fires and minimize their impact on communities.

Our Lobbyist, Mapes and Mapes is actively monitoring these House Bills!

House Bill 491 Sponsored by Representative Kathy Edmonston

This bill provides relative to the Life Safety and Property Protection Licensing Act.

It offers an exemption to Felons whose charges are 15 years old.