A recently identified dataset containing roughly 183 million exposed email and password combinations has raised new concerns across the security landscape. While this was not the result of a single breach, the collection appears to be an aggregation of previously leaked credentials, stolen passwords captured through malware, and large-scale lists used in automated login attacks. The scale of exposure is significant, and for those working in the life safety and security industry in Louisiana, the implications are real and immediate.

Professionals in fire alarm installation, monitoring services, access control integration, burglary alarm systems, and related life-safety fields operate in an environment where public trust, regulatory compliance, and system reliability cannot be compromised. Many technicians, administrators, and office personnel reuse passwords across multiple systems, including vendor portals, monitoring dashboards, email accounts, or remote access tools. When a reused credential appears in a leak of this size, cybercriminals can attempt to use it elsewhere in what is known as “credential stuffing.” The result could be unauthorized access to a monitoring center’s platform, a cloud-connected alarm panel, customer databases, or internal business systems.

In Louisiana, the consequences of such a breach extend beyond inconvenience. Many of the systems managed by life-safety professionals fall under regulatory oversight and are directly tied to protecting lives and property. An attacker gaining entry through a compromised credential could disable alarm notifications, modify system configurations, or disrupt reporting. Such activity could endanger lives, trigger contractual or regulatory violations, and damage the reputation your business has worked hard to build.

The most important step professionals should take in response to this exposure is to review the credentials used throughout their organization. Passwords should be unique to each system, not repeated or shared informally among employees. A strong password manager is valuable for generating and storing complex passwords securely. Additionally, multi-factor authentication should be enabled on every critical system, especially monitoring dashboards, technician access tools, vendor portals, and email accounts. Multi-factor authentication adds a second layer of verification that makes it significantly harder for attackers to gain access, even if they have a password.

Companies should also periodically require password updates and conduct internal credential audits to determine whether any email accounts or logins appear in known breach databases. When a compromise is suspected, swift action is crucial: reset affected credentials, review access logs, verify system configurations, and ensure devices used by staff have not been infected by malicious software. It is also essential to ensure that each technician or service employee has only the level of access necessary to perform their role, reducing the impact if one set of credentials is compromised.

This is also an appropriate moment for life-safety companies to speak directly with their vendors, suppliers, and monitoring partners. Vendors should be able to confirm whether they require unique logins per technician, allow secure password policies, and support multi-factor authentication. If a vendor’s platform does not support current security standards, that gap should be documented and addressed as part of your company’s risk management planning.

Finally, this issue should be discussed openly with employees during training and staff meetings. Credential exposure is not just an IT problem; it is a frontline operational concern. Every employee who logs into a system that affects life safety plays a role in protecting that system. Clear training, clear expectations, and clear accountability help ensure the safety of the environments you protect.

The recent exposure of 183 million credentials is a reminder that even when systems themselves are secure, human habits and convenience can create vulnerabilities. By strengthening credential practices now—before an incident occurs—Louisiana’s life safety and security professionals can continue to uphold the trust that families, businesses, and first responders place in our industry every day.

In the complex arena of public policy and regulation, trade associations play a critical role for industries like life safety and property protection. These industries are deeply affected by local ordinances, state licensing requirements, and national code-standards. Having a dedicated lobbyist means the association can actively monitor bills, regulatory initiatives, and administrative proposals, advocate directly to decision-makers, and build coalitions that protect member interests and support industry advancement. In short, effective advocacy ensures businesses aren’t merely reacting to change — they help shape it. 

For the Louisiana Life Safety & Security Association (LLSSA), government and industry representation is one of the core member benefits. The association has retained Kevin Cunningham of Southern Strategy Group as its lobbyist, bringing decades of experience and proven advocacy in Louisiana’s legislative environment. llssa.org He is actively monitoring relevant bills, coordinating with LLSSA leadership, and providing members with updates on how proposed legislation—such as licensing changes, code-oversight shifts, and inspection rules—might affect their operations. 

At the local level, a lobbyist helps members engage with parish or municipal rule-making where alarm ordinances, permitting, and inspections are set. At the state level, the lobbyist tracks changes to statutes governing licensing (such as for licensed monitoring or alarm installation), code adoption by the state fire marshal’s office, and regulatory fee structures—issues like those LLSSA is already watching. At the national level, although LLSSA is state-based, a lobbyist provides insight into trends such as federal tax law, equipment standardization, communications regulations (for monitoring and alarm reporting), and even wholesale import rules that impact alarm manufacturers and integrators.

By investing in this representation, LLSSA allows its members to focus on their business and technology, while still having a voice at the table when laws and regulations increasingly shape how life-safety and property-protection companies operate. For any member of the life safety/protection industry—whether you’re installing fire alarms, access control, security systems or monitoring services—this kind of advocacy isn’t an optional extra: it’s a strategic asset.

The False Alarm Reduction Association (FARA) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to reducing unnecessary alarm activations that waste resources and undermine public confidence in life safety and property protection systems. Serving as a bridge between public safety officials, alarm companies, and end users, FARA promotes cooperation and education to ensure alarm systems are properly designed, installed, and used. The organization produces a wide range of publications, model ordinances, and training programs to help jurisdictions and industry professionals manage alarm systems more effectively. Through its network of public safety personnel and private industry members, FARA fosters the exchange of ideas, solutions, and real-world experiences that lead to stronger community partnerships and safer environments.

FARA’s work plays a vital role in reducing the burden false alarms place on emergency responders while protecting the integrity of alarm systems that save lives and property. By encouraging the use of proven standards, verified response procedures, and end-user education, FARA helps alarm companies and monitoring centers improve service, reduce liability, and strengthen relationships with local authorities. For the life safety and property protection industry, FARA’s efforts represent a shared commitment to professionalism, accountability, and public trust—ensuring that every alarm, when it sounds, truly matters.

One of the most common challenges facing modern organizations is the existence of silos—departments or teams that work independently with little communication or shared purpose. While specialization can increase efficiency within a department, silos often create barriers that prevent the organization from realizing its full potential. When departments fail to collaborate, valuable information remains trapped, opportunities are missed, and innovation is stifled.

At their core, silos are not just structural; they are cultural. They arise when teams focus narrowly on their own metrics, tools, and goals rather than the broader mission. For security and life safety professionals, this can be particularly damaging. A lack of coordination between physical security, cybersecurity, operations, and executive leadership can lead to blind spots, fragmented risk management, and slower responses to critical incidents. When these groups fail to share data or insight, the organization’s overall resilience suffers.

Breaking down silos requires deliberate leadership and a shared vision that transcends departmental boundaries. Leaders must communicate that collaboration is not optional—it is a cornerstone of success. Creating shared goals and common performance measures helps align priorities, ensuring that each department understands how its actions contribute to the organization’s larger purpose. Technology can also help, particularly through integrated platforms that allow for seamless information sharing across teams. However, technology alone cannot solve a cultural problem. Trust, open communication, and mutual respect are the foundation of any unified organization.

For those in the life safety and property protection industry, this philosophy is especially relevant. Consider a scenario where a security company’s sales team makes promises that the operations or compliance teams are unaware of. Without cross-department communication, customer satisfaction and regulatory compliance both suffer. But when teams collaborate—sharing project updates, compliance requirements, and technical feedback—the customer experience improves, and the business becomes more agile and competitive.

True organizational growth happens when individuals and teams understand that their success is interdependent. Each department has a role to play, but it is the collective effort that drives innovation and long-term sustainability. Building bridges between teams doesn’t just improve communication; it strengthens the organization’s culture, enhances decision-making, and ultimately moves the entire enterprise to a higher level of performance.

In the life safety and property protection industry, communication is constant — proposals, service tickets, inspection reports, and customer updates fly back and forth by email every day. Many companies automatically include a long legal paragraph at the bottom of every message — the email disclaimer.

But are these disclaimers really necessary? Recent commentary from industry attorney Ken Kirschenbaum (Aug 26 and Sept 16, 2025) revisits that question, reminding us that while disclaimers are common, their legal power is limited. Still, there are times when they make good business sense.

The Myth of the Mandatory Disclaimer

As Kirschenbaum explains, there’s no federal or state law that requires an email disclaimer for most businesses — including those in the alarm and security trades. The typical “this message is confidential” notice may look official, but it rarely carries legal force.

In most cases, recipients never agreed to be bound by that disclaimer, and courts are unlikely to treat it as a contract. So, while it may sound protective, it doesn’t necessarily protect anything on its own.

Still, that doesn’t mean disclaimers have no value. They can serve as a polite reminder that the message contains sensitive information and shouldn’t be shared — a deterrent to casual forwarding or public posting. Think of it less as a legal shield and more as a “handle with care” label.

When a Disclaimer Makes Sense

Even if not legally required, there are moments when an email disclaimer is a smart layer of professional protection:

1. Confidential or Privileged Information
   When emails contain customer security plans, system drawings, or access details — anything that could compromise a client’s safety if leaked — a confidentiality statement is appropriate. It signals that the content is sensitive and expected to stay private.

2. Attorney or Legal Communications
   If you’re sharing messages that involve contracts, liability issues, or consultation with counsel, a disclaimer can help preserve attorney-client privilege or clarify that the communication isn’t formal legal advice.

3. Preventing Accidental Contract Formation
   When quoting prices or discussing terms by email, include language such as:
   “This email does not constitute a binding contract unless signed by an authorized representative.”
   That small line can prevent misunderstandings when clients interpret an estimate as a final agreement.

4. Regulatory or Privacy Compliance
   For companies handling alarm monitoring data, customer addresses, or personal details, email footers may include references to privacy policies or compliance statements. If you send marketing emails, CAN-SPAM and similar laws require company identification and an unsubscribe option — not a “disclaimer” per se, but the same principle of clear communication applies.

When It’s Just Legal Noise

Many email disclaimers are copied from templates that go on for several paragraphs — long enough that no one ever reads them. If your message includes no confidential information or sensitive terms, that boilerplate text adds clutter, not protection.

Kirschenbaum puts it bluntly: “I’ve never used a disclaimer, and I don’t think it serves any purpose in most situations.” For many alarm and fire companies, that’s true — most daily messages don’t need a legal warning. What does matter is training staff to handle sensitive information properly, not relying on a paragraph of fine print.

Best Practices for the Industry

For life safety professionals, here’s a practical approach:

• Use disclaimers selectively. Include them when messages involve confidential data, legal discussions, or contracts — not on every “thanks for your time” email.

• Keep them short. One or two sentences are enough. Long legalese doesn’t impress customers.

• Match message to practice. Don’t say “this message is confidential” if you’re copying half your team. Be consistent.

• Protect the data, not just the email. Encryption, access control, and disciplined record-keeping do far more to protect your company than any disclaimer.

Sample Disclaimer for Alarm Industry Use

This email and any attachments are confidential and intended only for the individual or company named above. It may contain proprietary or security-sensitive information. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it. No contract or agreement is formed by this email unless specifically stated in writing and signed by an authorized representative of [Your Company Name].

This type of disclaimer is concise, respectful, and tailored to the life safety industry — balancing professionalism with practicality.

Bottom Line

Email disclaimers are not a legal requirement, and in most cases, they don’t carry much legal weight. But used wisely, they show professionalism, protect sensitive data, and reinforce good communication practices.

As Kirschenbaum reminds us, “Unnecessary warnings may not have legal consequences, but they do deter bad behavior.” In an industry built on trust, safety, and accountability, that small reminder can go a long way.

Use the links below to access the Alarm Articles by Ken Kirschenbaum, ESQ this article is based on.

Managing work vehicles can be tough, no matter the fleet size. Holman is your all-in-one fleet solution, giving businesses the support needed to stay on the road and moving forward. Their experts deliver simple, ready-made, and industry-specific services that cover every step—from acquiring and customizing vehicles to ongoing management and maintenance. 

Holman helps you save with flexible vehicle acquisition and leasing options, including purchaseleaseback programs that turn assets into cash. Their upfitting services let you tailor vehicles with equipment or wraps designed for your exact needs. For long-term efficiency, Holman’s fleet management covers maintenance, fuel tracking, and telematics to keep everything running smoothly. 

And if you have vehicles or equipment sitting idle, Holman’s BuyDirect remarketing program helps you convert them into cash quickly. 

To learn more about how Holman can help your business, contact a Savings4Members Consultant at 603-628-2701 | info@savings4members.com

In today’s alarm industry, accuracy, accountability, and efficiency are more important than ever. For companies conducting fire and life safety inspections, using a dedicated software platform can transform the inspection process—improving performance for the technician, the customer, and the authority having jurisdiction (AHJ) alike.

Gone are the days of clipboards and manual data entry. A software-based inspection platform allows technicians to arrive on-site with all the historical data they need—previous inspection reports, asset lists, and testing results—already in hand. Instead of recreating site information from scratch, technicians can pick up where they left off. This not only saves time but also reduces the likelihood of data errors or duplicated work.

As assets are tested, the software can automatically link each result to its corresponding device, eliminating manual input and improving accuracy. Automated data capture helps ensure that no component is missed, and standardized workflows guide technicians step-by-step through the process. The result is a smoother, faster inspection that builds technician confidence and consistency across every job.

For customers, an inspection platform brings clarity and professionalism. When inspection reports are automatically generated in polished digital format—with digital signatures, complete test results, and clear summaries—they provide instant transparency. Customers can easily understand what was inspected, what passed, what failed, and what needs attention.

This digital record not only strengthens customer trust but also simplifies follow-up work. When a technician returns for the next inspection, prior reports and asset histories are readily available. Customers see continuity, precision, and care in how their fire alarm systems are maintained—qualities that reflect directly on the company’s reputation.

Perhaps one of the greatest benefits of inspection software lies in compliance. Every jurisdiction expects accurate documentation and traceable records. A digital inspection platform ensures that reports are standardized, time-stamped, and securely stored, making them easy to share with the AHJ during audits or reviews.

The ability to generate professional, consistent reports not only demonstrates compliance but also fosters a better relationship between the alarm company and the local authority. It shows commitment to accuracy, accountability, and life safety standards. For the AHJ, digital documentation reduces back-and-forth communication and streamlines the verification process.

For the alarm company, inspection software means fewer errors, faster workflows, and stronger customer relationships. For the customer, it means transparency and reliability. For the AHJ, it means accurate, consistent records that uphold public safety.

By embracing inspection software, alarm companies can move beyond paper trails and manual tracking to a system that is smart, connected, and compliant. The result is a process that saves time, protects data integrity, and enhances the professionalism of the entire industry.

Receiving feedback can be one of the most valuable parts of professional growth—but only if you understand it. Unfortunately, not all feedback is clear. Sometimes it’s vague (“You need to be more proactive”), contradictory, or delivered in a way that leaves you unsure what to do next. In his Fast Company article, cognitive scientist Art Markman suggests that instead of reacting defensively or making assumptions, you can turn confusing feedback into a productive learning moment by asking three key questions.

The first question is “What went wrong?” This helps you uncover the specific behavior or situation the person observed. Instead of guessing what they meant, you invite them to describe the action itself. The second is “What was the impact?” Understanding how your behavior affected others or the outcome gives you valuable insight into why the feedback matters. Finally, ask “What should I do differently next time?” This transforms the conversation from criticism to coaching, giving you practical steps for improvement.

By using these three questions, you shift the feedback exchange from confusion to clarity. You show openness to learning, demonstrate professionalism, and create a space for meaningful dialogue. In the end, the goal isn’t just to receive feedback—it’s to use it to grow, communicate better, and strengthen your working relationships.

We are deeply saddened to share the passing of Marie Willig Nicolich — a founding member of the Louisiana Life Safety & Security Association (LLSSA) and one of the guiding forces behind our industry’s earliest days. 

Marie served the LLSSA with distinction as President, Chairman of the Board, and Region 1 Vice President, playing a key leadership role when the original Life Safety and Property Protection law was created. Her dedication, strength, and passion for protecting lives and property set a foundation that continues to guide our association today.

Based in the New Orleans area, Marie and her husband built a successful security and fire alarm business serving the Greater New Orleans and Northshore communities. Her vision and advocacy helped shape Louisiana’s alarm and life safety industry into what it is today.

Marie’s legacy lives on in the laws she helped create, the professionals she mentored, and the safer communities we all enjoy because of her commitment.
May she rest in peace, and may we continue the important work she began.

Read more about her life and legacy here:
🔗 dignitymemorial.com/obituaries/metairie-la/marie-nicolich-12529064

A new survey by International Workplace Group has revealed a surprising shift in workplace dynamics: Gen Z workers are increasingly teaching their older colleagues how to use AI tools. While it has long been assumed that mentorship flows from senior employees to junior ones, the rise of artificial intelligence is flipping that tradition on its head. Younger employees, raised in a digital-first world, are now the ones guiding their more experienced peers through the evolving landscape of AI.

The study, which surveyed more than 2,000 office workers across the U.S. and the U.K., found that nearly two-thirds of Gen Z participants reported helping older coworkers integrate AI into their professional routines. The findings also show the technology’s growing impact on efficiency. A striking 86 percent of respondents said AI has improved their productivity, estimating an average of 55 minutes saved each day. More than three-quarters agreed that AI had a positive effect on their careers, underscoring its role as a transformative force across industries.

This trend highlights a reversal of traditional mentorship models. In many areas, seasoned professionals continue to provide critical guidance in strategy, leadership, and organizational knowledge. Yet when it comes to the practical application of AI tools—whether for drafting reports, generating insights, or automating repetitive tasks—it is younger employees who are in the teaching role. Their willingness to share knowledge through hands-on demonstrations and practical advice is creating a new layer of collaboration in the workplace.

The exchange is not one-sided. Older employees contribute deep domain expertise, institutional memory, and judgment that help contextualize AI usage and guide its application in meaningful ways. Mark Dixon, CEO of IWG, noted that this reciprocity strengthens intergenerational teamwork and amplifies the benefits of AI adoption. The dynamic is flattening barriers between generations, creating a sense of shared learning and mutual respect rather than reinforcing rigid hierarchies.

Still, the shift brings challenges. Not all older workers are eager to be taught by younger colleagues, and some may feel uncomfortable or even undermined in the process. There are also questions of access and consistency, since informal peer teaching is not always aligned with company-wide policies on AI usage. Without proper oversight, shortcuts or untested methods could create risks. At the same time, the pressure on Gen Z employees to serve as informal trainers can add to their workload and potentially lead to frustration or burnout.

Despite these hurdles, the broader implications are positive. Organizations that embrace reverse mentoring and encourage open knowledge exchange are likely to adapt faster to technological change. By fostering psychological safety and rewarding collaboration, companies can build cultures where it is acceptable to ask for help, regardless of age or title. Pairing the technical fluency of younger workers with the wisdom of older ones creates a balanced approach that strengthens resilience and innovation.

As AI becomes further embedded in daily workflows, the willingness to learn across generations may become one of the most important workplace skills. Gen Z’s role as guides in this transition is more than a matter of teaching tools; it is a sign of how technology can unite rather than divide. In helping their older colleagues embrace AI, these younger workers are not only boosting productivity but also reshaping the very culture of work.