Gas Detection Alarms

Fuel gas leaks in homes are a growing safety concern. Across the United States, emergency responders handle thousands of gas-related incidents each year, many of which could be prevented with early detection. Recognizing this need, the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) introduced NFPA 715, the first standard dedicated to the installation of fuel gas detection and warning equipment in residential properties. This new standard aims to bring the same level of protection to gas detection that smoke and carbon monoxide alarms have provided for decades.
NFPA 715 establishes clear guidelines for where and how fuel gas detectors should be installed. The standard specifies placement based on the properties of the gas—natural gas, which is lighter than air, should have detectors installed high on walls or ceilings, while propane, which is heavier than air, requires detectors lower to the ground. Detectors can be stand-alone devices that alert only the home’s occupants or interconnected systems that notify both residents and central monitoring stations. Power sources for these alarms may be hardwired, plug-in, or battery-operated, with battery models required to have a ten-year lifespan and a low-battery warning system.
The urgency behind NFPA 715 is driven by real-world incidents. Major gas explosions, such as the one in Baltimore in 2023, have highlighted how odor fade and delayed leak detection can lead to tragedy. Utility companies like Con Edison have already deployed hundreds of thousands of gas detectors in homes, detecting leaks and preventing potential disasters before they escalate. In some areas, such as New York City, new laws now require fuel gas alarms in residential properties, aligning with NFPA 715’s recommendations.
Debates continue over how extensively the standard should apply to individual appliances versus entire rooms, and manufacturers are working to develop more advanced detection technologies. Even as discussions evolve, the adoption of NFPA 715 marks a significant step forward in residential safety. By filling a long-standing gap in gas leak detection, the standard sets a new baseline for protecting families from a silent but deadly threat.
Notice Around Potential Hazard Involving Fire Blankets

For immediate release
Contact:
Fire Protection Research Foundation – Lorraine Carli – publicaffairs@nfpa.org
Fire Safety Research Institute – Laura Zilverberg – laura.zilverberg@ul.org
The Fire Protection Research Foundation and The Fire Safety Research Institute Issue Notice Around Potential Hazard Involving Fire Blankets Used for Electric Vehicle Fire Suppression Efforts with Battery Involvement
Key Takeaways:
- Experiments conducted by both organizations have demonstrated a potential explosion hazard when fire blankets are used during electric vehicle (EV) fire suppression efforts when there is battery involvement.
- When flaming is eliminated by the fire blanket, the ongoing accumulation of flammable gases released by continued thermal runaway in the battery pack presents a potential explosion risk.
- The experiments reinforce the need for continued research on EV firefighting tactics.
May 30, 2025 (QUINCY, MA & COLUMBIA, MD) — The Fire Protection Research Foundation (FPRF), the research affiliate of NFPA, and The Fire Safety Research Institute (FSRI), part of UL Research Institutes, today issued a notice about a potential explosion hazard when fire blankets are used during electric vehicle fire suppression efforts with battery involvement.
- During experiments involving the use of electric vehicle fire blankets to suppress an EV fire with battery involvement, it was observed that the deployment of a fire blanket eliminated flaming by denying oxygen to the vehicle and the battery fire.
- While the flaming was eliminated, battery thermal runaway propagation continued after blanket deployment, which resulted in the continued release and accumulation of flammable battery gases into the volume under the blanket.
- In some of the experiments, this accumulation of flammable gases under the blankets presented an explosion risk to firefighters operating near the vehicle.
- The risk of an explosion can be increased when re-introducing air into an oxygen-depleted accumulation of unburned flammable battery gases.
FPRF is conducting research to improve the safety of firefighters responding to electric vehicle fires and incidents by assessing current firefighting tactics and tools used by the fire service to manage EV incidents and the impact of suppression activities on managing re-ignition risks. Recent experiments for the Assessment of EV Firefighting Tactics, Tools and the Impact on Stranded Energy research project were conducted to assess the ability of four firefighting tactics to suppress and establish control of fire incidents involving standalone electric vehicle battery packs and full electric vehicles with confirmed battery pack fire involvement: standard hose stream application – water only; standard hose stream application – with injected agent; electric vehicle fire blankets; and firefighting appliances.
Analysis of the data from FPRF experiments is underway. Preliminary results will be presented at the annual NFPA Conference & Expo on June 16, 2025 in Las Vegas and the full analysis will be provided in FPRF’s forthcoming research report, which will be publicly available this fall at nfpa.org/foundation.
FSRI is conducting research to improve understanding of hazards generated by electric vehicle battery fires and to enable the development of firefighting tactics for effective electric vehicle fire control. Recent experiments for the Fire Safety of Batteries and Electric Vehicles research project were conducted to evaluate the capability of standard hose stream application, water application with an under-vehicle nozzle, and an electric vehicle fire blanket, to suppress and establish control of a burning electric vehicle with confirmed battery pack fire involvement. Analysis of the video and data from FSRI experiments is underway and will be addressed in detail in FSRI’s forthcoming electric vehicle research report, which will be available at fsri.org.
About Fire Protection Research Foundation
The Fire Protection Research Foundation is the research affiliate of NFPA. The Foundation is an independent nonprofit whose mission is to plan, manage, and communicate research in support of the association’s mission to help save lives and reduce loss with information, knowledge and passion. The FPRF facilitates research on a broad range of fire safety issues in collaboration with scientists and laboratories around the world.
About Fire Safety Research Institute
The Fire Safety Research Institute (FSRI), part of UL Research Institutes, advances fire safety knowledge to address the world’s unresolved fire safety risks and emerging dangers. As part of UL Research Institutes, we are committed to sharing our fire safety insights with everyone to advance UL’s public safety mission of providing safe living and working environments for people everywhere. Through advanced fire science, rigorous research, extensive outreach and education in collaboration with our international network of partners, we impart stakeholders with the information, tools and resources that enable them to make better, more fire-safe decisions that ultimately save lives and property. Learn more at https://fsri.org/.
About UL Research Institutes
UL Research Institutes is a nonprofit research organization dedicated to advancing public safety through scientific discovery. Since 1894, our research has advanced our mission toward a safer, more secure, and sustainable future. Focused on global risks from fire mitigation and air quality to safe energy storage and digital privacy, we conduct rigorous independent research, analyze safety data, and partner with experts to uncover and act on existing and emerging risks to human safety. Discover more at UL.org.
10 Things about AI

As artificial intelligence continues to evolve at a rapid pace, business leaders must look beyond the hype and focus on strategic, thoughtful integration. In 2025, AI is no longer an emerging trend—it’s a core part of many organizations’ operations, often embedded in systems without formal recognition. Leaders need to start by understanding where AI is already in use within their companies, whether in chatbots, predictive analytics, or customer management tools.
One major development is the widespread, and often unauthorized, adoption of generative AI platforms like ChatGPT and Bard. Employees across industries are using these tools to streamline everything from writing and planning to coding, often without IT approval. This informal usage highlights the growing need for formal governance policies that both protect the organization and guide responsible innovation.
Importantly, businesses must avoid falling into the trap of adopting AI just to stay trendy. Implementing AI for the sake of appearing forward-thinking can result in wasted resources and minimal return. The focus should always remain on solving meaningful business problems. AI should be deployed only when it improves outcomes, reduces costs, enhances customer experiences, or increases efficiency in a measurable way.
For AI to succeed, it must be more than a technology initiative—it must be a cultural shift. Building a strong foundation means investing in workforce training and fostering a company-wide understanding of AI’s capabilities and limitations. Teams that understand the “why” behind AI adoption are more likely to implement it effectively and ethically.
Perhaps most critical is the role of data. High-quality, structured data is the backbone of any successful AI program. Poor data hygiene can cripple AI tools, leading to bad decisions and reduced trust in the system. That’s why companies must prioritize building reliable data pipelines and strong data governance from the outset.
Integrating AI into existing workflows is also essential. Isolated pilot programs and experiments are no longer sufficient. True value comes when AI tools are embedded directly into daily operations—supporting everything from customer service to supply chain management. Seamless integration ensures adoption and maximizes impact.
As AI systems take on more decision-making responsibilities, issues of trust and explainability become vital. Stakeholders—from executives to regulators—need to understand how AI models arrive at their conclusions. Transparent, interpretable systems are necessary not only for ethical compliance but also for building confidence in the technology.
Security and privacy must also be front of mind. As AI systems interact with sensitive data and power critical functions, the risks of breaches, misuse, and bias increase. Business leaders must establish clear governance frameworks that address cybersecurity, data privacy, and ethical considerations at every stage of AI development and deployment.
Meanwhile, the talent shortage remains a serious challenge. The demand for AI-literate professionals, including engineers, data scientists, and strategic thinkers, far exceeds the current supply. Companies will need to offer competitive packages, support internal training, and build partnerships with educational institutions to keep up.
Finally, ethics must be a proactive priority. It is not enough to implement AI and address issues later. Leaders should establish ethical guidelines from the beginning—covering fairness, accountability, and transparency—and maintain ongoing oversight through audits and governance committees.
In sum, 2025 demands a sophisticated, strategic approach to AI. Business leaders must ensure their organizations are not only technically ready but culturally and ethically prepared to harness the full power of artificial intelligence. Those who get it right will unlock transformative value—those who don’t risk falling behind in a rapidly evolving digital economy.