The Louisiana Life Safety and Security Association (LLSSA) is excited to announce its upcoming August Regional Meetings, offering valuable opportunities for education, networking, and industry updates. From Monroe to Baton Rouge, each event will feature a mix of training sessions, CEUs, committee meetings, and social gatherings tailored to professionals in the life safety and security industry.

Monday, August 18 – Region 5 – Monroe
The week kicks off in Monroe at Surge Entertainment by Drew Brees. Attendees can expect a Regional Meeting and Social, as well as an Administrative Rules Class, providing critical insights into regulatory compliance and licensing updates.

Tuesday, August 19 – Region 4 – Shreveport
Join Region 4 members at Great Raft Brewery in Shreveport for an evening of camaraderie and updates. The event includes a Regional Meeting and Social, giving attendees the chance to reconnect, share concerns, and hear the latest from LLSSA leadership.

Wednesday, August 20 – Region 3 – Lake Charles
This full-day event in Lake Charles at Bayou Rum Distillery includes CEU opportunities, a Plan Review Class, and the Regional Meeting and Social. It’s a great chance for contractors and technicians to meet licensing requirements while learning more about plan submittal best practices.

Thursday, August 21 – Region 2 – Baton Rouge
The final stop brings LLSSA to the Jones Creek Library in Baton Rouge. Region 2’s event includes CEUs, a Regional Meeting, and an Administrative Rules Class, wrapping up a productive week of statewide engagement.

📍More information and registration will be available soon at:
https://llssa.org/regional-meeting/

Don’t miss this opportunity to stay informed, earn CEUs, and strengthen connections within Louisiana’s life safety and security community!

In a notable rebuke to Governor Jeff Landry, the Louisiana Senate and Governmental Affairs Committee narrowly voted 4–3 to reject House Bill 603, which sought to expand the governor’s authority over appointments to 32 state licensing boards and commissions. These boards oversee a wide array of professions, including healthcare providers such as nurses, dentists, and physical therapists, as well as accountants, plumbers, and engineers.

Under the current system, the governor appoints board members from lists of nominees provided by professional trade associations and industry leaders. The proposed legislation, authored by Rep. Dixon McMakin (R-Baton Rouge), aimed to allow the governor to appoint members directly, bypassing these nomination lists. McMakin argued that the existing process permits industries to select their own regulators, potentially undermining consumer protection.

Despite support from some lawmakers, including Sen. Greg Miller (R-Norco), who expressed concerns about industry self-regulation, the bill faced bipartisan opposition. Sen. Blake Miguez (R-New Iberia) questioned whether the bill would strip industries of their voice in the appointment process, making it “purely political.” Sen. Gary Carter (D-New Orleans) echoed these concerns, stating, “This kind of gives even more power to an already powerful executive branch.” Sen. Larry Selders (D-Baton Rouge) also expressed apprehension, noting that recent expansions of gubernatorial power made further consolidation unwarranted.

This rejection comes in the context of recent legislative changes that have already increased the governor’s influence over state boards. In 2024, lawmakers granted Landry the authority to appoint chairs of 150 state boards and commissions directly, including the 32 boards targeted in HB 603. Additionally, changes to the Louisiana Coastal Restoration and Protection Authority and the Louisiana Board of Ethics have expanded gubernatorial appointment powers.

While HB 603’s failure marks a setback for Governor Landry’s efforts to consolidate executive authority, Rep. McMakin indicated that the proposal could be revisited before the legislative session concludes on June 12.

On April 27, 2011, one of the deadliest tornado outbreaks in U.S. history struck the southeastern United States, with Alabama bearing the brunt of the devastation. The Huntsville-Madison County 911 Center faced an unprecedented surge in emergency calls, receiving approximately 1,700 calls that day—over three times its typical daily volume. 

Despite the overwhelming demand, the center successfully managed every call, thanks in large part to its advanced dispatch technology. The Hexagon computer-aided dispatch (CAD) system enabled dispatchers to efficiently process and route calls, even when they originated from outside their jurisdiction. For instance, as calls from Tuscaloosa County flooded in, the system facilitated swift coordination with the University Police Department to ensure timely responses. 

Modern advancements in dispatch technology have further enhanced emergency response capabilities. Features such as assistive artificial intelligence help prioritize calls, while text-to-911 services provide alternative communication channels during crises. These innovations ensure that emergency services can adapt to the dynamic challenges posed by natural disasters.

The experiences from the 2011 tornado outbreak underscore the critical role of dispatch technology in disaster response. By enabling efficient communication, resource allocation, and inter-agency coordination, such technology not only streamlines emergency operations but also saves lives. As natural disasters become increasingly frequent and severe, continued investment in and evolution of dispatch systems remain paramount for public safety.

For a detailed account of the Huntsville-Madison County 911 Center’s response during the April 27, 2011 tornadoes, refer to the original article on the National Electronic Security Alliance’s website. 

When alarm contractors find themselves unable to comply with current code—such as NFPA 72—due to equipment limitations or conflicting manufacturer instructions, they should take several proactive steps to protect both their clients and themselves legally and ethically:

First, they must document the issue in writing, detailing exactly why compliance isn’t possible. This includes referencing the specific code sections in question, the equipment involved, and the nature of the conflict or limitation. Thorough documentation is critical if the situation leads to liability concerns later.

Next, the contractor should notify the property owner or client in writing. This notification should clearly explain the potential risks, including what aspects of the system may not perform as required by code, and advise them on safer alternatives or upgrades. Transparency ensures the client is fully informed and shares in the decision-making.

Contractors should also consult with the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ)—typically the fire marshal or local code enforcement official. AHJs may be able to offer guidance, issue conditional approvals, or recommend acceptable alternatives based on their interpretation of the code.

Finally, it’s wise to seek guidance from a qualified fire protection engineer or third-party code consultant. Involving experts can validate your concerns and support your case when working with AHJs or manufacturers. Whenever possible, alarm contractors should push for manufacturers to redesign flawed systems that make code compliance impossible.

By documenting concerns, communicating with clients and authorities, and seeking expert support, contractors can reduce liability, maintain ethical standards, and advocate for safer, code-compliant systems.

We are pleased to announce that Cat Fleuriet has been appointed as the new Chairperson of the LLSSA Scholarship Committee. Cat brings energy and a passion for supporting future industry professionals, and we’re excited to see her lead this important program forward.

We also extend our deepest gratitude to Ed Hilderbrandt, who has faithfully served as Scholarship Chairperson for many years. His dedication and leadership helped build a program that has provided meaningful support to students across Louisiana pursuing careers in life safety, security, and related fields. Thank you, Ed, for your years of tireless service and commitment to the association’s mission.

The Scholarship Committee works year-round to raise funds, promote the program, and review applications to award scholarships to deserving individuals with ties to our industry. Learn more about the program here: https://llssa.org/benefits/scholarships

If you’re interested in giving back and helping grow the next generation of professionals, we invite you to join the Scholarship Committee. Your involvement—whether helping fundraise, promote, or review applications—makes a lasting impact. Reach out today to get involved!

Smoke detectors are critical safety devices that require regular upkeep to ensure they function effectively. Cleaning them is a simple yet essential task to keep them performing properly when needed most.

How Often Should You Clean a Smoke Detector?
The frequency with which you clean your smoke detector depends on several factors, but as a general guideline, you should clean your detectors at least twice a year. A good way to remember this is to clean your smoke detectors when you change your clocks for daylight saving time—this ensures you never forget.

Over time, smoke detectors naturally accumulate dust and debris from the air. This is evident in areas with poor ventilation, construction dust, or high levels of indoor pollutants. Moisture in the air can cause dust and other particles to stick to the detector, which can interfere with its function. In these environments, it is recommended to clean your detectors every three to four months.

How Do You Clean a Smoke Detector?
Cleaning a smoke detector is straightforward, but it must be done correctly to avoid damaging the unit. If your smoke detector is mounted high on the ceiling or hard to reach, you’ll want to safely remove it using a Detector Removal Tool. This tool is specifically designed to help you detach smoke detectors from their mounting brackets without risk of damage.

Now, grab an air duster, which quickly removes contaminants and prevents buildup that could affect performance.  The air duster should be gentle yet powerful, ensuring sensitive components inside your detector are cleaned without damage. This helps maintain the sensor’s sensitivity and functionality.  Next, wipe down the exterior of the detector with a soft cloth or microfiber towel to remove any remaining dust and grime. Once cleaned, reinstall and your detector is ready to go.

What Are the Risks of a Dirty Smoke Detector?
Neglecting to clean your smoke detector can have serious consequences, both in terms of performance and safety. A dirty smoke detector is much more likely to fail when you need it the most. Here’s why:

• Reduced Sensitivity: Dust, dirt, and debris can block the sensor and interfere with its ability to detect smoke. This reduces the effectiveness of the alarm, which could delay your response time in the event of a fire.
• False Alarms: A buildup of particles in the detector can also lead to false alarms. Dust or residues might trigger the detector when there’s no real threat, leading to frustration and, in some cases, complacency—causing people to ignore or even disable their detectors.
• Premature Failure: A dirty smoke detector works harder to detect smoke, which can cause internal components to wear out faster. A buildup of grime can reduce the lifespan of the detector, meaning you may have to replace it sooner than necessary.
• Fire Safety Risk: Ultimately, the biggest risk of a dirty smoke detector is that it may fail to alert you in the event of a fire. The peace of mind that comes with knowing your smoke detectors are working properly is invaluable.

Cleaning your smoke detectors regularly is an easy, cost-effective way to ensure your safety equipment continues to work as it should. With the right tools—an air duster for cleaning and a Detector Removal Tool for safe removal—you can keep your detectors functioning at their best.

We are thrilled to announce the appointment of a new Golf Chairperson for LLSSA. Donald McLaren, who has been a dedicated co-chair for the Golf committee, will now take on this vital role following the retirement of Ed Hilderbrand, who served with unwavering commitment for many years. As we transition, we invite professionals interested in making a difference to reach out and explore service opportunities within our organization. Your leadership could help shape the future of LLSSA!

We are thrilled to announce the return of a seasoned leader to the LLSSA Board – Kristin Hebert with Alarm.com. With years of dedicated service and a wealth of experience, our new Chairperson for the Bylaws Committee will guide us through a pivotal time. This is a fantastic opportunity for members to step forward and explore various roles within our board and committees. Your expertise is invaluable to our mission, and we encourage you to reach out to express your interest in contributing to our community. Together, we can drive meaningful change!

Fire detectors are vital components of any building’s safety infrastructure, providing crucial early warnings in the event of a fire. By quickly alerting occupants, these devices facilitate timely evacuations, significantly reducing the risk of injury and loss of life. To ensure optimal performance, regular testing and maintenance are essential for building owners and facility managers. This commitment to reliability is supported by codes such as NFPA 72, which mandates routine inspections of fire alarm systems, and NFPA 25, which governs the inspection and maintenance of water-based fire protection systems. Investing in these measures not only protects lives but also safeguards property and enhances overall safety.

TESTING REQUIREMENTS
In the U.S., various legal requirements dictate the maintenance and testing of fire detectors, with noncompliance potentially resulting in fines or penalties. NFPA 72 specifies that fire alarm systems should be inspected by a qualified professional at least every six months. Additionally, many insurance policies require regular testing and maintenance as a condition of coverage. Failure to meet these obligations could jeopardize claims in the event of a fire and have serious repercussions for responsible parties. By prioritizing regular testing, you gain peace of mind and ensure compliance.

“A functional test of smoke detectors shall be performed at intervals not exceeding six months, or more frequently as required by the manufacturer’s instructions.”
-NFPA 72, 2019, Section 14.4.3.3

PREVENTING FALSE ALARMS
Fire detectors can malfunction over time due to dust, debris, or electrical issues, compromising reliability. Regular testing identifies problems early, ensuring malfunctions are detected during routine checks, not emergencies. Timely maintenance allows for the replacement of faulty detectors, ensuring continuous protection. False alarms can be disruptive and costly. Regular testing verifies detectors are working properly, minimizing false alerts from factors like dust, debris, or insects, especially with improper installation. Disruptions can lead to unnecessary emergency visits and reduce occupants’ responsiveness to genuine alarms. Codes like NFPA 101 emphasize proper installation and maintenance to prevent these issues.

COMPLIANCE WITH MANUFACTURERS
Manufacturers provide specific guidelines for testing and maintaining fire detectors, which are crucial for warranty coverage and performance. Products from reputable
manufacturers, are UL listed and comply with standards like UL 268 for smoke detectors and UL 521 for heat
detectors.

“Functional testing of smoke detectors shall ensure that the detectors properly detect smoke and activate the alarm system. This can be achieved by using an appropriate test device or method as recommended by the manufacturer.” -NFPA 72, 2019, Section 14.4.3.4

PEACE OF MIND
Fire detectors are essential for protecting lives and property, enabling rapid detection, timely evacuations, and effective emergency response. While serious fires are rare, the risk
remains, making regular testing of fire detection systems crucial. Regular testing ensures the system is ready to respond, safeguarding both occupants and assets. Functional tests, as required by industry codes like NFPA 72 and NFPA 25, verify that detectors are functioning properly, preventing false alarms and ensuring the system operates effectively for optimal safety. 

Louisiana House Bill 145 (HB 145), introduced in the 2025 Regular Session, proposes to enhance the state’s construction code retrofitting income tax deduction. This bill is particularly relevant for professionals in the life safety and property protection industry, as it could influence homeowner demand for safety upgrades and retrofitting services.

Under current law, homeowners can claim a tax deduction for voluntarily retrofitting their residences to comply with the State Uniform Construction Code, with the deduction limited to 50% of the incurred costs or $5,000, whichever is less. HB 145 seeks to expand this deduction by including costs associated with bringing homes into compliance with the “fortified home” standards established by the Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety. Additionally, the bill proposes to increase the maximum deduction amount from $5,000 to $10,000 per retrofitted residential structure, while maintaining the 50% cost limitation.

For life safety and property protection professionals, the passage of HB 145 could lead to increased homeowner interest in retrofitting projects aimed at enhancing structural resilience against natural disasters. This heightened demand may result in more opportunities for businesses specializing in safety assessments, code compliance upgrades, and installation of protective systems. Professionals should prepare to address inquiries related to the “fortified home” standards and consider offering services that align with these guidelines.

The proposed changes would apply to taxable periods beginning on or after January 1, 2026. Staying informed about the progress of HB 145 and understanding its implications will be crucial for professionals aiming to capitalize on the potential increase in retrofitting activities prompted by the enhanced tax incentives.